THE MOBILE BORDERS OF EUROPE
The idea of mobile borders comes from the following assumption: besides political borders or even physical borders, which form the identity of a population, there exist forms of “substantial moves” due to migration. For example, after Italy was united a substantial percentage of the population immigrated to the American continents; this phenomenon broadened the Italian borders in the new world, culturally, socially and economically. In the homeland, on the other hand, besides the economic benefits (the importance of the money sent back home ) migration caused long-term effects in international politics (the choice in favour of the Atlantic Alliance, for example). Not more than one hundred years have gone by and the same borders now coincide, in a dynamic logic of Europe-Mediterranean, with the new frontier south and east of the old continent, with consequences, which have still to be defined. The idea of mobile borders becomes legitimate not only because of fluctuations set by recent migration but also for at least two other macro phenomena: the first is constituted by revolutions that made geo-political borders flexible, overcoming them with the impetuosity of ideas; the second, by the supremacy of science over nationality.
Dino Renato Nardelli
Giovanni Codovini
DIDACTIC MODULE
The mobile borders of Europe. 1875-1975
The following module is divided into three didactic units
|
I D.U. The Geopolitics of the Revolutions 1848-1917
|
II D.U.
The migrations. 1875-1975 |
III D.U.
« Clerici Vagantes » 1980-2000 |
At the end of the didactic unit it would be a good idea to insert a “local” case, pertinent to one of the decided periods based on the attached map.
|
Comment . Reasons for Choice. The three didactic units outline a geographic-historic approach so that the “paradigm Europe” falls into the logic of space before that of time. In the first didactic unit one must keep in mindthe ideal red thread that orginated in modern European politics, the second deals with the unhinging of space, the third instead points towards science as a factor that opens the borders of the nations but that gave rise to Western Europe.
We will develop the II didactic unit as a basis for a laboratory aimed at sharing didactic language and models. “The Migrations. 1875-1975 leaving the other two didactic units as background material.
|
N.B. As established at the NEOS meeting in Warsaw, the proposal is to cover the II D.U.
D.U. II Migration 1875 - 1975
I° SEQUENCE
The context of the 19th century: A Long term phenomenon
Map 1: The directions of European Emigration in the world (19th century.)
Map worksheet:
* Statistics from your area. Indicate the numerical quantity of people departing for each single destination.
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Map 2: A panorama of the European industrial areas (1875)
Map worksheet:
Observe the map and answer the following questions:
* Is there a “Europe” beyond the individual nations?
* Does Europe in the 19th century have within its borders areas of emigration which are also industrial areas?
* Are these areas within today’s state borders? What kind of emigration do they attract?
* What kind of a relationship exists between European transatlantic migration and internal mobility?
|
Comment. Reasons for Choice The didactic and historic objective is to demonstrate how mobility within European territory goes beyond the borders of the individual states. Europe is also a product of mobility and of social-economic mechanisms which originate from a logic which is different to that of political
|
II° SEQUENCE
Migration in the 20th century.
Time Frame 1944-1952
FACTORS OF EXPULSION
Historic document 1: Klaus J. Badie, Europe in Movement, Migration from the 18th century to today, Laterza, Roma-Bari, 2001, pp. 342-353
Task on document:
After having analysed the text, list the expulsion factors that determined the fracture of 1944 –1952.
| The Fracture 1944-1952 | |
|
Expulsion Factors
|
Comment
|
Map 3: Movement of people in Europe between 1944 and 1952
Map worksheet
By observing the map, the directions, the quantity, and the protagonists of the movement of people, emerge in the period given.
a) Narrate the information pertaining to your region.
b) Fill out the task sheet below describing the expulsion factors for your region, referring to local sources and/or historic sources (cite your sources).
DESCRIPTION TASK SHEET
|
|
Comment. Reasons for Choice The document proposed is of European inquiry and regional fields finally relate to one another (the overcoming of local history). Map 3 joins two kinds of problems which deserve to be disentangled: movement due to repositioning of population tied to war and the new emigration tied to an economic trend.
|
III° SEQUENCE
The Flow of Migration in the 20th century.
Time Frame 1944-1952
Attraction Factors
Historical Document 1: Klaus J. Badie, Europe in movement. Migration from the 18th century to today, Laterza, Roma-Bari, 2001, Pg. 342-353
Task on document:
After having analysed the text, list the factors of attraction that determined the fracture of 1944-1952.
| The Fracture 1944-1952 | |
|
Factors of Attraction
|
Comment
|
Map 3: Movement of people in Europe between 1944 and 1952.
Map worksheet:
By observing the map, the directions, the number and the protagonists of the movement of people, can be found.
a) Narrate the information pertaining to your region.
Fill out the task sheet below describing the factors of attraction for your region, referring to local sources and/or historic sources (cite your sources).
DESCRIPTION TASK SHEET
|
|
Comment. Reasons for choice. The didactic task acts on two levels: one focuses on history and the other on the contribution to research on the part of a local observer. The latter is a good way to raise to new hypothesis to develop in the classroom.
|
IV° SEQUENCE
The flow of migration in the 20th century.
Time Frame 1973-1974
The New Migration: Change and Continuity
Historical Document 2: Saskia Sassen, Migration, Colonies, Refugees. From Mass Emigration to the fortress of Europe, Feltrinelli, Milano, 1999, pgs.95-101.
Task on Document:
After having analysed the text, list the states of origin of the immigrants from your area during the period 1954 – 1973.
| WORKSHEET
FOR RELEVANT DATA
|
Map 4: Using the map, graphically show the information you gathered from
Document 2
|
Reasons for Choice.
The Dutch historian states that migration movements are not caused by the desire to improve one’s living conditions. Besides the modification of the work market on a global scale, the migration process is very selective since the protagonists are only specific groups and they are strictly connected to the relation between the country of departure and the country of arrival. The fracture at the beginning of the seventies, due to the energy crisis, was fundamental in the outline of phenomena in global economy.
|
U.D.II La Lunga durata: il contesto nel XIX secolo

Atlante delle carte storiche SEI (carta n°1)
U.D.II La Lunga durata: il contesto nel XIX secolo

Atlante delle carte storiche SEI (carta n°2)
U.D.II La Lunga durata: il contesto nel XIX secolo

Atlante delle carte storiche SEI (carta n°3)
Information collected during the Euroseminar
COUNTRY |
DESTINATION | PUSH FACTORS | PULL FACTORS | NOTES/COMMENTS | |
Finland |
From Karelia to the rest of Finland (300.000) |
Political: v War with Russia v Loss of Karelia to Russia |
Cultural: v Finland as homeland |
Migration within | |
France |
From Italy to France |
Economic: v Poor living conditions
|
Economic: v Reconstruction after W.W. II: acute shortage of labour force |
Migration outside | |
England |
British Colonies, South Africa, USA |
Social: v Difficult conditions after the war (rationing, lack of housing) Economic: v Skills not valued highly enough Climate |
Prospect of a better life
Higher wages
|
Migration outside | |
|
|
Europe |
Cultural: v Introduction to different lifestyles(experencied during the war) |
|||
Germany |
From the Ruhr to rural parts of Germany |
Political: v War (bombing)
|
Political v Free from war dangers |
1944-1945. Migration within (evacuation) | |
Germany (Ruhr) |
From Germany to North and Latin America |
Economic: v Bad living conditions after the war |
Economic: v Economic chance in America
|
Migration outside 1945-1952 | |
Germany (Ruhr) |
From other parts of Germany to the Ruhr |
Economic: v Lack of employment
|
Economic: v High wages in mining and steel industry during reconstruction period |
Migration within 1945-1952 | |
Germany (Ruhr) |
From Soviet Occupation Zone (later German Democratic Republic) to West Germany |
Political: v Refugees from Stalinist system Economic: v Low standard of living
|
Political: v Democratic system in West Economic: v Higher standard of living because of faster development |
Migration within 1945-1952 | |
Germany (Ruhr) |
From Poland, Czechoslovakia and eastern provinces of the German Reich |
Political: v Expulsion of German population at the end of the war |
Political: v People flee to the rest of Germany
|
Migration outside/within 1945-1952 | |
Italy (Umbria) |
Within Umbria to Perugia 50% |
Economic: v Poor living conditions of rural zones (sharecropper, day labourer)
|
Economic: v Seeking employment in areas of : mining, construction, service industries |
Migration within/outside 1944-1952 | |
|
From Umbria to Rome (50%) |
Economic: v Delay in industrial development and/or difficulty in industrial restructure |
Migration within/outside 1944-1952 | ||
Italy (Umbria) |
|
Social: v Joining of families
|
Social: v Reuniting of Family
|
Migration outside |